U.S Supremes Won’t Hear FCC’s 2015 Appeal for Net Neutrality Order

Nov 8, 2018

Kelly Potter

Kelly Potter

Subscribe to Our Blog

The Transcendent Beat! Get the latest updates from us.


The US Supreme Court has, in a 4-3 vote, declined to hear challenges to the FCC’s 2015 network neutrality order that was adopted during the Obama administration under then-FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler. Two major telecom and cable trade groups associated with many of the nation’s ISPs shrugged this off as not being a “big surprise.”

“Those rules, which aimed to regulate broadband like a utility under a Title II classification, were challenged by ISPs, but have since been rolled back by an Republican-led FCC run today by Chairman Ajit Pai, in a decision that took effect in June,” according to LightReading.

The change fits with the deregulatory stance of the Trump administration. The Supreme Court essentially found that the rollback rendered any appeals moot.

The NCTA – The Internet & Television Association commented “it is ‘not surprising’ that the Supreme Court declined to hear a case that went back to the Wheeler-era FCC. Once the current FCC repealed the 2015 Order, almost all parties — including NCTA — agreed that the case was moot, the group said in its statement. Today’s decision is not an indication of the Court’s views on the merits but simply reflects the fact that there was nothing left for the Court to rule on.”

United States Telecom Association (USTelecom) president and CEO Jonathan Spalter, echoed that the SCOTUS’s vote was expected, as the FCC’s more recent Restoring Internet Freedom Order “remains the law of the land.”

Jonathon Spalter also commented that the Free Press plans to file a final brief in a new appeal challenging the FCC rollback of the rules under Chairman Pai.

And that rollback is also under pressure from some US states that have voted on their own network neutrality bills or have them in the works.

California, which had voted on a tough new network neutrality law, has cut an agreement with the US Department of Justice and groups representing many US ISPs that delays enforcement of its law, which was on track to take effect next year. That agreement, which needs approval from the California district court, is effectively on hold while the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reviews and resolves the FCC’s 2017 Restoring Internet Freedom Order.

Kelly Potter

More From Transcendent

Smart CAPEX Strategies for Your Hotel

Smart CAPEX Strategies for Your Hotel

It’s Monday morning and your hotel’s general manager requests a list of assets to include in next year’s capital expenditures (CAPEX) budget by the end of the month. As the director of engineering,...